kent solicitor
Quick Links

Acceptable Use Policy

Here are examples of how the Internet and technology can rebound on the Employer

1. Vicarious liability. Employers are liable for the activities of their employees at work in relation to other employees and to the outside world.

1.1. Outside world. The question is whether the employee was acting in the course of his employment. An employee can be so acting even if working at home or away on business, so the time of day or place at which the activity is done is not a deciding factor. Connex paid a commuter damages when a Connex employee seriously injured a commuter in an arm lock, when the latter objected to ticket inspection


1.2. Other employees. As employer, you may be held accountable by an employee, who feels that she or he is being harassed or discriminated (whether sexual or racial) against by a fellow worker. A risqu' photograph or joke sent to a fellow-worker by email can trigger a complaint

2. Defamation. Whether an email is viewed as libel (permanent) or slander (verbal, non-permanent), it is clear that defamation proceedings will lie. British Gas agreed to pay more than £200,000 in libel damages in 1999 in one of the first email damages cases settled in the UK. British Gas sent an internal memorandum to staff stating that they should have no dealings with a competitor, Exoteric Gas Solutions and implied that it was in financial trouble. It had been set up by an ex-British Gas employee, the former head of engineering. This led to his suffering loss and damage and there was no justification for the boycott.

3. Viruses. If an employee downloads software or opens email with viruses, it can trash your system and perhaps, go on to infect the systems of all your clients and contacts.

3.1. Virus-checkers are always out of date. You can have run the latest version but this will not catch the very latest virus.
3.2. Employees need to be trained to be suspicious of anything coming from an unrecognised source and prohibited from surfing generally for non-work related purposes and indeed from private use of the Internet altogether
 

4. Privacy generally. The Human Rights Act 1998, Article 8 reads: "Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others

5. Privacy at work. The European Court of Human Rights has held that an employee has a legitimate expectation of privacy at work. Employers should therefore not read private emails. How will he know what is private until after he has read them! It has now been suggested that an employer ringing an employee at home might be an invasion of privacy

6. Breach of confidence. This is another growing area of litigation. In one case, the producer for a TV programme was held to have breached a confidential relationship with the Claimant even though all material in the programme was already in the public domain, in particular the newspapers

7. Further, it is too easy to send an email to an unintended recipient so it is sensible for business to seek to protect themselves as much as possible against the legal consequences of an error by routinely ensuring that communications have confidentiality notices, warnings and disclaimers. However, it will not save their embarrassment

8. Conclusion. Protect yourself as much as possible by issuing to all your staff an Acceptable Use Policy and make sure it dovetails with your Disciplinary and Grievance Procedure.
 

E-mail confidentiality notices, warnings, and disclaimers


Consider what E-mail confidentiality notices, warnings, and disclaimers you need and set up your systems so that employees cannot unthinkingly omit them. You could end your emails with any combination of the following statements:

  •  "The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient and may be legally privileged. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than this addressee, nor may it be copied in any way."

  •  "If received in error, please contact Kaslers Solicitors LLP, a UK law firm, on +44 (0) 1622 618647 quoting the name of the sender and the addressee and then delete it from your system."

  •  "Please note that neither Kaslers Solicitors LLP nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the email and attachments (if any)."

  • "No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Kaslers Solicitors LLP by means of email communications."

  • "You should be aware that under the provisions of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 e-mails and telephone calls may in certain circumstances lawfully be intercepted and we accept no liability for any loss or damage which may result to its correspondents as a result of such interception."

  • "Copyright in documents created by or on behalf of this firm remains vested in the firm and we assert our moral rights, unless the terms of the relevant clients engagement provide otherwise

Related topics you may find useful:

Data Protection
Discrimination
Unfair Dismissal

Call Michael Breeze on 07900 195 195 or call 0845 270 2511 to set up an appointment