Deeds of Separation
Often, one of the separating couples suggests a Deed of Separation,
rather than getting on with the divorce immediately
This might be a sensible course if there are young children or
religious objections, but where there are no children or they
have 'flown the nest', it seems sensible to us that the parties
should get on and agree the financial division, so that
they can both get on with their lives.
The
divorce courts must look at the finances as at the date of hearing,
not as at some date years earlier when the parties separated.
The Court can take the Deed and the financial circumstances at
separation into account, but they are not bound by the terms of
the Deed
Often the parties' financial situation may have changed by then
and the one who has 'made good' financially since the separation
is aggrieved to hear that their estranged spouse has a claim on
their new found wealth.
Think what could have happened in the intervening years!
One may have inherited money, got promotion and enhanced salary
at work, but the other party may have been made redundant or fallen
ill, so that they cannot earn at all.
No-one has a crystal ball and so it can work either way. If
you fall on hard times, then you might be glad to hear that you
have an enhanced claim against your estranged spouse who has done
rather well.
If you were the one who has prospered, then you feel aggrieved.
We find that most people make the decision that they would rather
get things sorted now and 'paddle their own canoe' in the future.
We have dealt with cases recently where the Deeds of Separation
were in 1992 and 1998 respectively. Luckily for the 1992 husband,
the wife stuck by her agreement and a divorce consent order was
readily agreed in the terms of the original deal between them
Unfortunately for the 1998 husband, the wife had spent what
she had got originally and wanted to come back for more. At first
sight, it looked as though the husband had prospered but it took
a lot of initial work, a court hearing and further work over nearly
a year to persuade the wife that
-
His circumstances
had not altered dramatically.
-
He had made full
disclosure of his financial circumstances at separation and
she had entered into the Deed with legal advice (both of which
she initially denied.
-
Taking into account
all the circumstances the Court would probably make an Order
in terms of the Deed of Separation.
Eventually, we succeeded. Then arose the question of who should
bear the husband's legal costs incurred? They were not inconsiderable·..but
that is another story
Speak to Michael Breeze (07 900 195 195 ) of Kaslers Solicitors
LLP (0845 270 2511)
Related topics you may find useful:
Divorce trust funds
Unmarried couples
and property
Conduct in divorce
Buying new property before divorce
is finalised
Separation or divorce ?
Call Michael Breeze on 07900 195 195 or call 0845 270 2511 to
set up an appointment